Should I put money in a TFSA or RRSP?

TFSAs are a great way to save $5000 every year (cumulatively $20,000 as of 2012) on a completely tax free basis. While deposits to a TFSA are not tax deductible, all income, capital gains and dividends are completely tax free.

Whether TFSAs are a better long term savings choice over an RRSP depends on your tax rate now, versus what your tax rate will be when you withdraw your money. If your tax rate is higher when you withdraw money, then the TFSA makes more sense. However, if your tax rate is lower when you withdraw money, then the RRSP is the better choice.

Generally, maximizing both your RRSP and TFSA is your best option, but if money is limited, for most working people saving for retirement, maximizing your RRSP first (to get a bigger tax refund in a higher tax year) makes the most sense.

TFSAs are advantageous for maintaining your ‘emergency fund’, saving for short term goals, and when you have already maximized your RRSP room.

Once you reach age 65, your government entitlements will be income tested. As TFSA earnings and withdrawals are not reported as income, thus potentially preserving government entitlements.

February 1st, 2012 | Posted in General, Investments, Retirement Planning, Taxes | Comments Off

Time for a Sure Thing?

The past few years have not been very kind to investors, especially to those recently or soon to be retired.  Just as investors dragged themselves out of the rubble of 2008, along came 2011.  For those nearing retirement, there just isn’t enough time to be able to make up any losses so caution is the key word.  For those who are already retired and are receiving our income in the form of RRIF payments a downturn in market could be disastrous.  If you are looking for shelter from the roller coaster ride of volatility inherent in the market and maybe trying to find a “sure thing”, you may want to consider PensionBuilder from Manulife Financial.

An individual who invests in PensionBuilder will receive a guaranteed income for the rest of his or her life at a fixed rate of return (income benefit payout percentage).  The payout percentage is set at the time of the income selection, from 3.75% at age 50 to 6.75% at age 80.  If the income option is deferred for one or more years after deposit, the investor will receive a 5% bonus for each year deferred.  This bonus is notional and increases the value against which the payout percentage is applied.  For example, let’s assume that an individual makes a $100,000 deposit into PensionBuilder at age 65 but defers taking his or her income until age 71.  With bonuses, at age 71, the total retirement fund for income purposes has grown to $125,000. At age 71, the income benefit payout percentage is 5.85% resulting in a guaranteed income for life of $7,312.  If income had been taken at age 65 the income benefit payout percentage would have been 5.25%.  The effect of waiting five years to take income has increased the payout percentage from 5.25% to 7.312% guaranteed for life.

If, however, the funds deposited were an RSP and were converted to a RRIF at age 71, the minimum income required by law to be withdrawn as a RRIF minimum may be higher than the benefit payout percentage of the Pension Builder. In this case, PensionBuilder guarantees that the payout will be the RRIF minimum or the benefit payout percentage whichever is the HIGHER.  Income may also be structured as a joint life payout with a benefit payout percentage that is 50 basis points less than a single life payout. 

At first glance, PensionBuilder may resemble a life annuity which also pays a guaranteed income for life.  PensionBuilder, however, has features and contract provisions which differentiate it from an annuity.  Some of these are as follows:

  • An annuity is a single, closed transaction meaning that once contracted it cannot be undone or surrendered for value, whereas PensionBuilder can be surrendered for its market value at any time (a charge may apply):
  • In an annuity, should the annuitant die after the expiration of the guaranteed period, there is no residue to the estate or beneficiaries.  With PensionBuilder if market conditions are favourable a death benefit could result which could be significant;
  • PensionBuilder allows for additional deposits to be made prior to the income period.  In our previous example, the investor could make contributions for the first five years in addition to the $100,000 deposit, providing for even more lifetime guaranteed income when that option is taken.

For investments which are non-registered the income provided by PensionBuilder is very tax efficient.  Most of the income received is considered to be a return of capital and compares most favourably to other non-registered investments such as bonds or guaranteed investment certificates.

All deposits made to PensionBuilder are invested in a “fund of funds” that Manulife has created for this purpose. The PensionBuilder fund is comprised of three of Manulife’s conservative investment funds.  PensionBuilder is a segregated fund and, as such, may provide protection against creditor claims. Also, since a beneficiary is named there is no probate nor administrative costs at death, nor any Wills Variation legislation concerns.

For investors who have been concerned with market stability in the years leading up to their retirement, PensionBuilder from Manulife Financial may be as close to a sure thing as they are going to find. 

If you are interested in reviewing your retirement planning, call us and we can discuss this and other investment opportunities in more detail.

January 19th, 2012 | Posted in Estate Planning, Insurance, Insurance & Retirement Solutions, Investments, Pensions, Retirement Planning | Comments Off

How Much Insurance Does A Business Need

It is common business practice for a company to use corporate owned life insurance in several situations. This article will identify those situations and discuss appropriate amounts of coverage for each of them.

SHAREHOLDERS’ AGREEMENTS – It is customary for a company with more than one shareholder to have in place an agreement between the shareholders which predetermines a course of action for specific situations. This agreement should include a Buy/Sell provision which deals with how a share interest will be purchased or redeemed in the event that a shareholder relinquishes or wishes to relinquish his or her shares in the company, including the death. The corporation will then insure each of the shareholders to the extent that the provision in the agreement dealing with death is all or partially funded. The same is true for those businesses operating as a partnership, as there should be a partnership agreement with provisions similar to the corporate agreement.

The corporation should own and be the beneficiary of sufficient life insurance on each of the partners in order to meet its obligations to re-purchase or redeem the shares of the deceased shareholder from his or her estate. The Shareholders’ Agreement usually has a method of valuing the shares and this is the appropriate amount for which the shareholder should be insured.

KEY PERSON LIFE INSURANCE – A company may employ an individual whose active participation in the company is vital to its success. Some of examples of this “key person” , include an individual who is responsible for the sales success of the company’s product; it could be someone who has an intellectual property key to the enterprise’s good fortune; a law firm may have as a partner an outstanding litigator or effective rainmaker. In other words, if the company should suffer financially as a result of the loss of any employee, shareholder or otherwise, then that company has an insurable interest in that individual.

The amount of life insurance coverage that the company would take on that key person is usually determined by an estimate as to how much the company would suffer financially if the key employee were to die. Sometimes this can be an arbitrary number, although the insurance company requires justification for any amount of coverage they would issue for this purpose. In other situations, an analysis is undertaken to estimate the loss to share value due to the death of the employee. A company may want to insure such an individual to provide sufficient funds to attract, train and employ a replacement. Usually, this number would include two years salary in addition to acquisition and training costs.

LIFE INSURING DEBT – Often a business will make use of bank debt to produce income. This debt may be for normal operating expenses, to make an acquisition vital to the business purpose of the corporation and its shareholders, to pay a dividend to shareholders, or to make a pension contribution for its employees, to name a few. Where the company has borrowed for a business purpose, it is prudent for the firm to insure the lives of the principals so that if there was a death, the loan would be retired. This would protect the working capital of the firm, and would contribute to guaranteeing the financial stability of the company even though it has just lost a key shareholder. Also, many lenders require the shareholders to provide personal guarantees to secure the loan. By life insuring the shareholder in this arrangement, the estate of the deceased is relieved of this burden.

There are some tax advantages for corporations to insure their shareholders to secure debt as well. If the bank requires the life insurance as a condition of the loan (or provides a letter to that effect), a portion of the premium may be tax deductible to the corporation. In order to obtain this deduction the transaction must meet specific criteria as stated in the Income Tax Act. Upon the death of the shareholder, there is another benefit which could accrue to the benefit of the surviving shareholders. Even though the entire proceeds of the life insurance are used to retire the loan, there could be a contribution to what is known as the Capital Dividend Account for an amount up to the insurance proceeds which are used to repay the loan. Capital Dividends can then be paid tax free to the surviving shareholders. In effect, this means that future corporate earnings, retained earnings, or other cash assets can be paid tax free to the shareholders.

The amount of the life insurance required for this use could be equal to the amount of bank or other debt the company has incurred.

These are the main uses of corporate owned life insurance. Other corporate uses for life insurance exist in more sophisticated arrangements. For example, some corporations use life insurance as part of a charitable giving strategy. We can assist you in determining where the needs for life insurance exist in your corporation and how to establish the appropriate amount. Please call us should you wish to investigate the prudent business practice of corporately owned life insurance.

January 4th, 2012 | Posted in Estate Planning, General, Insurance | Comments Off

Does it make sense to buy life insurance on a young child?

The short answer is yes! There are several important advantages to buying life insurance for your young child or grandchild.

Life insurance premiums are based on the age and health of the applicant. In a typical situation, a married couple will buy their first life insurance policy once they have started a family, to cover the risk of an income earner passing away unexpectedly. In many cases the applicant may be facing certain health problems which result in higher premiums, and in some cases they may be completely declined due to poor health. Conversely, buying a permanent life insurance policy for your young child has a lower cost and is guaranteed to be in force for their entire life, even if they develop a serious illness later in life.

Additionally, the gift of a universal or whole life policy to a child or grandchild allows values to accumulate tax deferred so that eventually it can be used to help them go to university,  buy a home, start their own business, or even  supplement their retirement.

Finally, with proper planning, such a gift is protected from future claims of creditors and guarantees an estate to your child or grandchild.

November 22nd, 2011 | Posted in Insurance, Insurance & Retirement Solutions, Retirement Planning | Comments Off

“I have a small business. What’s the most affordable way that I can provide group benefits to my employees?”

Benefits have become an integral part of any employees’ compensation package. It is more important than ever for employers to provide a benefit plan that is suited to their employees’ needs, all the while still being cost-effective.

The most affordable benefit plan for a small business is contingent on many factors unique to each individual business. Demographic factors of age, sex, occupation and marital status of a company’s employees affect which benefit plan is most economical. There are also a number of different ways in which a benefit plan can be funded. A self-insured plan requires the business to pay directly for the cost of employee expenses, while an insured plan involves the business paying a set fee (rate) to an insurance company, who then bears the cost of providing the agreed upon benefits. Another option is insure one’s small business through a pool of companies, which eliminates the volatility from year to year. Companies can choose to build a plan that uses a combination of these different funding methods and plan designs.

Building a cost-effective benefits plan for a small business can be an extremely complex process. However, with the help of an employee benefits expert, it can be simplified and save a business a great deal of money in the long run, while still fulfilling the employees’ needs. After all, one’s employees’ needs are a company’s most valuable assets, and they deserve a benefits plan that recognizes this.

October 25th, 2011 | Posted in General | Tagged , | Comments Off

Are You On The Right Track?

In the last bull market many investors started to develop unhealthy expectations as to the long term yields their investments would provide. Many had come to accept returns as high as 15% to 20% per annum as the base return their fund and portfolio managers would earn for them. Of course, these expectations came crashing back to earth in 2008 as the bull was chased away by a very large bear. Today, many fund managers are of the option that double digit returns are going to be very difficult to achieve with any consistency over the long term. Perhaps it is time to lower our expectations.

If we have to accept lower rates of return do we want to be exposed to the same previous level of risk? Currently, there is tremendous volatility in the equity markets and, as a result, many of us are now wondering wether or not we are on the right track with our investment strategies. Given recent developments in the world markets over the past few years, there are other questions we should ask ourselves in order to make this determination.

1. What are my goals?

If we don’t know what the target is, chances are it is going to be difficult to hit. It is important to have an understanding of what we are investing for. Are we accumulating for shorter term goals, such as the purchase of a house, the education of our children? or is the major objective to save for retirement? Perhaps it is a combination of these goals. If we know why we are investing and what the time frame for accumulation is we can determine how much risk is acceptable.

2. What is my risk tolerance?

This probably will depend on where you are in the life cycle. Investors who are in their 20′s to mid 30′s usually tolerate greater risk as they have sufficient time to make up any losses. In the middle years, especially when trying to save while raising and educating our children, steady growth with less risk is often the approach. At retirement, investors usually become extremely risk averse as this is the time that capital is turned into income to replace earnings.

3. What are my retirement needs?

Converting capital into a consistent income might be the objective for the retirement years. For example, if we know what our fixed expenses will be, providing a guaranteed investment income that covers these expenses will help us to enjoy a comfortable retirement.  While GIC’s might guarantee the capital, it only guarantees the interest rate up to the maturity date.  The new Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit plans (GMWB) guarantee the cash flow for life while still providing the opportunity to enjoy investment growth.

In the years prior to retirement we pay particular attention to ensure that our investments receive favorable tax treatment. We should not have to abandon that concern in retirement to have safety of our capital. 

4. Are my investments tax efficient?

With a registered plan (RSPs, IPP’s etc.) all investments are treated the same – tax deductible going in (highly tax efficient), totally taxable as income coming out (highly inefficient).  Looking at non-registered investments, usually the higher the risk the more tax efficient the investment.  Pure capital gains are taxed at the lowest rate, guaranteed income (such as a GIC) at the highest rate.  Dividends are taxed somewhere in the middle.  Ideally, it would be extremely beneficial to have the safety of a GIC paying a reasonable rate of return that is guaranteed for life, while at the same time taxed at the lowest possible rate – exactly what the GMWB provides.

There are many types of financial vehicles and most of them are appropriate in the right circumstances.  Employing effective portfolio allocation can ensure that you are not unduly affected by equity volatility, fluctuating interest rates, or high rates of income tax.

Knowing the answer to these four questions should go a long way in determining whether or not you are on the right track.  Having a full understanding of the options available to you is important.

There is nothing as certain as uncertainty.  We live in very turbulent times with respect to the investment climate and developing an investment strategy during this time can be a very daunting and confusing task.  Given that there are now investment vehicles that deal specifically with many of the issues facing investors today, discussion and consultation has never been more important.

October 17th, 2011 | Posted in Estate Planning, Insurance, Insurance & Retirement Solutions, Investments, Pensions, Retirement Planning | Comments Off

Do you have a Retirement Income Strategy?

Canadians are faced with new realities that pose significant challenges to traditional retirement planning. Many Canadians are retiring earlier and living longer than ever. Currently, the average retirement age in Canada is age 62.  With many living into their 90s, bridging that gap can be extremely challenging.

Each Canadian must take charge of his or her own retirement. Join us to learn how
you can provide a secure and predictable stream of income so YOU can take charge
of YOUR retirement.

ZLC will be hosting seminars on How to Guarantee Your Income for Life 

Learn how you can:

  • Receive a 5% bonus every year until you start taking income
  • Enjoy predictable, sustainable, worry-free retirement income guaranteed for life
  • Protect your income from market downturns and lock in potential market growth
  • Minimize your taxable income and maximize your government entitlements

Check out our different dates and locations.

Reserve your seat now!

October 11th, 2011 | Posted in Insurance & Retirement Solutions, Investments, Retirement Planning, Updates | Tagged | Comments Off

ZLC Financial Group Presents…

UPDATE FOR PROFESSIONALS BREAKFAST SERIES

“Planning for US Estate Tax and CDA Planning”

The US estate tax provisions changed in 2010. Benita Loughlin, KPMG LLP,  will provide an update of cross-border estate planning issues and opportunities for Canadians with US assets and US citizens resident in Canada.  The focus will be on identifying situations where there is tax exposure and opportunities to minimize tax. 

The Capital Dividend Account presents numerous opportunities for tax effective corporate planning.  Jack Shaffer, ZLC Financial Group, will revisit the “magic” of the Capital Dividend Account for corporate planning plus look at the two biggest mistakes that corporations make with respect to shareholder life insurance.  In addition, we will look at recent updates and trends that impact personal and corporate estate planning.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Four Seasons Hotel – Le Pavilion I & II
791 West Georgia Street 
Full Breakfast 7:30 am / Presentation 8:00 am – 9:30 am

 
 
September 16th, 2011 | Posted in Estate Planning, Insurance, Investments, Taxes, Updates | Comments Off

“I am in the process of getting a divorce. As a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA), how can you help me?”

Anyone who has gone through a divorce or separation knows what a stressful process it is. Emotions like fear, anger and guilt often cloud judgement. Misinformation and misconceptions are detrimental to making good choices, and many have false expectations that they will be able to continue their accustomed style of living.

As you go through this process you’ll need professionals who can keep you grounded and focused on the issues, with realistic expectations. Lawyers are crucial as legal advocates, and accountants will provide comprehensive current valuations. As a CDFA, I forecast the long term financial outcome of the divorce settlements you are considering, to help you and your legal advisor compare the likely consequences of different courses of action and the impact of various settlement options over the course of your lifetime.

This considers not just the divison of current assets and income,  but factors like future earnings, family, retirement and insurance needs, incorporating investment returns, taxes, government benefits, longevity and inflation.

Financial analysis helps ensure a good, stable economic future and prevents long term regret over financial decisions made. My goal is to ensure you make the best informed decision possible.

Heidi U. Pullem CFP, CDFA

September 14th, 2011 | Posted in General | Tagged , , | Comments Off

4 Questions to Ask Before You Transfer Property to Children

Transferring property to your children or buying property in their names – either in their name alone or jointly with yourself – can be a complicated endeavor.

Parents typically consider transferring property to their children to:
avoid probate fees on the property
• provide an investment for their children
• help a newly married child
• avoid capital gains tax

However, there are conditions under which transferring property to your children could trigger capital gains. Before going ahead with a property transfer to one or more of your offspring, consider these important questions:

Does my child have financial problems?
If so, their creditors can launch legal proceedings and obtain a judgment that can be registered against the property, or even result in its sale.

Is your child married or in a common-law relationship?
If the relationship dissolves, their spouse may claim a portion of the property.

Is your child the subject of a fraud?
It’s possible they may be persuaded to invest funds using the property as security for a loan.

Do you intend to transfer a property that’s not your principal residence, such as a family cottage or rental property, to your child?
By doing so, you will be deemed to have sold half your share. This may trigger tax on any capital gains on the transferred portion. If you later transfer back to yourself the property that was previously transferred to your child, this could trigger a capital gain for your child.

Discussing the potential risks and safeguards of such transfers or purchases with your legal counsel will ensure you follow a plan that works best for you.

August 3rd, 2011 | Posted in General, Taxes | Comments Off